Suckage by design
I have a hypothesis, but at the risk of you having my review deleted, I will actually include a real *review* with the hypothesis, as they are most definitely linked. I will also attempt to answer the question in the last review I left, which was disputed and deleted: How can a movie with a score of 1.1 make front page?
I have seen your work before; I know you're capable of better than this. Also, I have seen *this* work before; you're using recycled images and music, rather than original content.
The music and graphics are upbeat and sufficiently capturing for something with a punchline, but this had none. Summarily, this is recycled work contributed no value to the content of NewGrounds.
But I see what were trying to do: by keeping a low score with high-ranking reviews, you have the potential to get on the front page (as an underdog). Therefore, you're disputing all negative feedback, while at the same time actually *asking* people to vote low.
I think this is a cheap scam to make the front page, boost your account stats and waste Newgrounds space. The movie's intention was to suck -- it is the graphical equivalent of spam, BY DESIGN. So there. Now you know how to improve it, and what I don't like about it. Good luck disputing this one.